Admin Team
07 Apr

Landmark Supreme Court Judgments (Ultra Crisp Notes)


Golaknath vs State of Punjab (1967)

→ Held Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights to protect civil liberties

→ Why: Fear of misuse of amendment power

→ After: Led to 24th Amendment (1971) restoring Parliament’s power


Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973)

→ Introduced Basic Structure Doctrine

→ Why: To prevent unlimited constitutional amendments

→ After: Parliament can amend but cannot destroy basic structure


ADM Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla (1976)

→ Allowed suspension of FR during Emergency

→ Why: State power prioritized over individual liberty

→ After: Later overruled; strengthened civil liberties & Art 21


Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India (1978)

→ Expanded Article 21 (Right to Life)

→ Why: To ensure fair, just, and reasonable procedure

→ After: Introduced due process concept in India


Minerva Mills vs Union of India (1980)

→ Balanced Fundamental Rights & DPSP

→ Why: Prevent dominance of either

→ After: Limited amending power reaffirmed


Olga Tellis vs BMC (1985)

→ Recognized Right to Livelihood under Art 21

→ Why: Survival linked to livelihood

→ After: Expanded scope of Right to Life


Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu (1992)

→ Upheld Anti-Defection Law

→ Why: Prevent political instability

→ After: Allowed judicial review of Speaker’s decisions


Indra Sawhney vs Union of India (1992)

→ Fixed 50% reservation cap + Creamy Layer

→ Why: Balance equality & social justice

→ After: Became basis of reservation policy


S.R. Bommai vs Union of India (1994)

→ Strengthened Federalism & limited Article 356 misuse

→ Why: Prevent arbitrary dismissal of state governments

→ After: Judicial review of President’s Rule


Vishaka vs State of Rajasthan (1997)

→ Issued guidelines on sexual harassment

→ Why: Legal vacuum in workplace safety

→ After: Led to POSH Act, 2013


S.R. Chaudhuri vs State of Punjab (2001)

→ Minister must become MLA within 6 months

→ Why: Prevent misuse of executive power

→ After: No repeated reappointment without election


I.R. Coelho vs State of Tamil Nadu (2007)

→ 9th Schedule laws under Judicial Review

→ Why: Protect Basic Structure

→ After: Strengthened judicial supremacy


Puttaswamy vs Union of India (2017)

→ Declared Right to Privacy as FR (Art 21)

→ Why: Need for protection in digital age

→ After: Basis for data protection laws


Shayara Bano vs Union of India (2017)

→ Declared Triple Talaq unconstitutional

→ Why: Violates gender justice

→ After: Led to Muslim Women Act, 2019


Navtej Singh Johar vs Union of India (2018)

→ Decriminalised Section 377

→ Why: Protect dignity & equality

→ After: Recognition of LGBTQ rights

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.