SHANTI Act and India’s Nuclear Development

IN NEWS: SHANTI Act and India’s Nuclear Development


Analysis

Why the SHANTI Act Is in News?

  • Parliament has brought into force the Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Act.
  • The Act repeals and replaces:
    • Atomic Energy Act, 1962
    • Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (CLND) Act, 2010
  • The legislation aims to accelerate India’s nuclear power expansion and enable private sector participation.

What Is the SHANTI Act?

  • SHANTI is a comprehensive legislation governing civil nuclear energy production, safety, liability and regulation in India.
  • It opens the nuclear sector to private companies and potentially foreign investment, which was earlier restricted to public sector entities.
  • It introduces a graded liability framework for nuclear power plant operators.

Objectives of the SHANTI Act

  • Expand India’s nuclear power capacity.
  • Reduce legal and financial barriers for private sector participation.
  • Align nuclear liability norms with global practices.
  • Ensure safety while encouraging investment and technology inflow.
  • Support India’s long-term energy security and decarbonisation goals.

Static Background: India’s Nuclear Power Programme

Current Nuclear Capacity

  • Installed nuclear capacity: 8.8 GW
  • Share in total installed power capacity: about 1.5%
  • Share in electricity generation: about 3%

Target under SHANTI

  • Increase nuclear capacity to 100 GW by 2047.
  • Public sector utilities are expected to add about 54 GW.
  • Remaining capacity is expected from private sector participation.

Key Changes Introduced by SHANTI

1. Liability Framework

  • Earlier CLND Act allowed operator recourse against suppliers if:
    • There was an agreement, or
    • Damage was due to supplier fault, or
    • There was deliberate intent.
  • SHANTI removes supplier fault-based liability.
  • The term “supplier” has been removed, eliminating indirect liability concerns.

2. Graded Compensation Caps

  • Liability is linked to plant capacity:
    • Above 3,600 MW: ₹3,000 crore
    • 3,600–1,500 MW: ₹1,500 crore
    • 1,500–750 MW: ₹750 crore
    • 750–150 MW: ₹300 crore
    • Below 150 MW: ₹100 crore
  • All existing Indian nuclear plants are 3,000 MW or lower.

Role of the Private Sector

  • Private firms can now build and operate nuclear power plants.
  • The graded liability system is designed to reduce investment risk.
  • The government argues this will help attract:
    • Advanced reactor technologies
    • Global capital
    • Domestic manufacturing capabilities

Nuclear Safety and Regulation

  • Nuclear safety remains central due to past global accidents:
    • Three Mile Island (1979)
    • Chernobyl (1986)
    • Fukushima (2011)
  • SHANTI grants statutory status to the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB).
  • However, the Central Government retains controlover:
    • Appointment of the AERB Chairperson
    • Granting of major licences

India’s Three-Stage Nuclear Programme (Static Component)

  • Stage I: Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors using natural uranium.
  • Stage II: Fast Breeder Reactors producing plutonium and U-233.
  • Stage III: Thorium-based reactors using U-233.

Current Status

  • India has not yet fully entered Stage II.
  • Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor commissioning has been delayed to September 2026.

Role of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

  • SHANTI implicitly supports India’s interest in Small Modular Reactors.
  • Features of SMRs:
    • Smaller capacity
    • Modular manufacturing
    • Require enriched uranium-235
  • Limitations:
    • Higher per-unit electricity cost
    • Do not significantly solve nuclear waste issues
    • Limited relevance to India’s thorium-based vision

Concerns and Criticism

  • Liability caps may be insufficient given high costs of nuclear accidents.
  • Removal of supplier liability could shift risk to operators and the state.
  • Continued government control over regulation raises questions of independence.
  • SMR dependence may dilute focus on thorium-based self-reliance.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen regulatory independence and transparency.
  • Ensure robust insurance and compensation mechanisms.
  • Balance private participation with public accountability.
  • Accelerate indigenous reactor and thorium technology development.
  • Integrate nuclear expansion with climate and clean-energy goals.

Updated – 21 December 2025 ; 07:46 AM IST | News Source: The Hindu