IN NEWS

Operation Sindoor and India–Pakistan Escalation (2025): Pulwama to Pahalgam Continuum

Introduction

Operation Sindoor marked one of the most significant cross-border military operations conducted by India against Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir after the Pahalgam terror attack (22 April 2025). The strikes represented a major escalation in India’s counter-terrorism doctrine, targeting what India described as terror infrastructure linked to Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM).The developments revived memories of the Pulwama attack (2019) and highlighted the continuing centrality of cross-border terrorism, Kashmir, LoC tensions, strategic signalling, and nuclear deterrence in India–Pakistan relations.

Background: Pulwama Attack (2019)

Pulwama Terror Attack

On 14 February 2019, a suicide bomber attacked a CRPF convoy in Pulwama, Indian-administered Kashmir, killing more than 40 Indian security personnel.The attack was claimed by Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), a Pakistan-based militant organisation.India accused Pakistan-based terror groups and alleged support structures operating from Pakistani territory. Pakistan denied direct involvement and demanded evidence.

Pakistan’s Response After Pulwama

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan stated:

• Pakistan would retaliate if India launched military action.
• India should provide evidence regarding Pakistan’s involvement.
• Kashmir required political dialogue rather than military escalation.

India maintained that:

• JeM leadership, including Masood Azhar, operated from Pakistan.
• Pakistan had failed to adequately act against anti-India terror groups.

Pahalgam Terror Attack (2025)

The Trigger Event

On 22 April 2025, armed militants attacked tourists at Baisaran meadow near Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir.

Casualties

• 26 persons killed
• Mostly Indian tourists

The attack was claimed by The Resistance Front (TRF).India alleged:

• TRF functioned as an offshoot/proxy of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).

Pakistan rejected involvement and demanded:

• Neutral investigation
• Evidence-based attribution

Escalation Before Operation Sindoor

Diplomatic and Strategic Measures

Following the Pahalgam attack:

India

• Suspended participation in the Indus Waters Treaty
• Intensified diplomatic pressure on Pakistan
• Increased military preparedness

Pakistan

• Threatened suspension of participation in the Simla Agreement (1972)
• Warned against military escalation
• Raised military alertness

Both countries:

• Reduced diplomatic engagement
• Expelled citizens and officials
• Increased military signalling along the border

Operation Sindoor (7 May 2025)

Nature of the Operation

India launched coordinated missile and precision strikes named Operation Sindoor against multiple targets in:

• Pakistan
• Pakistan-administered Kashmir (PoJK)

India described the strikes as:

• “Focused”
• “Measured”
• “Non-escalatory”
• Directed only against “terrorist infrastructure”

Chronology of Operation Sindoor

India’s Stated Objectives

India stated that the strikes aimed to:

• Dismantle terrorist infrastructure
• Prevent future infiltration
• Target operational camps of:
  • LeT
  • JeM
  • Hizbul Mujahideen

Indian officials stated:

• No Pakistani military installations were targeted.
• Precision weapons were used to minimise collateral damage.

Sites Targeted During Operation Sindoor

Major Sites Mentioned by India

India claimed these camps were involved in:

• Recruitment
• Radicalisation
• Weapons training
• Infiltration into Jammu & Kashmir
• Terror planning

Strategic Importance of Key Targets

Muridke (Punjab, Pakistan)

India alleged:

• Headquarters of Jamaat-ud-Dawa, linked to LeT
• Training centre connected with the 26/11 Mumbai attacks
• Ajmal Kasab reportedly trained here

Pakistan stated:

• A mosque and nearby civilian infrastructure were hit.

Bahawalpur

India identified:

• Markaz Subhan Allah
• Headquarters of JeM

India linked the facility to:

• Pulwama attack planning
• Radicalisation and indoctrination

Pakistan stated:

• Civilian residential areas and a mosque were damaged.

Muzaffarabad

India claimed:

• LeT training camps
• JeM staging facilities

Pakistan stated:

• Mosque complexes and civilian structures were hit.

Kotli

India identified:

• Abbas Camp
• Gulpur Camp
• HM-linked facilities

Pakistan reported:

• Civilian casualties including teenagers.

Pakistan’s Response

Pakistan described the strikes as:

• “Unprovoked aggression”
• “Act of war”
• Attack on civilian and religious sites

Pakistan claimed:

• Mosques and residential areas were struck
• Civilians, including women and children, were killed

Pakistan further stated:

• Indian aircraft were shot down
• Retaliatory strikes would continue

Cross-Border Escalation After Operation Sindoor

Pakistani Retaliation

Pakistan attempted strikes on multiple Indian military locations including:

• Srinagar
• Jammu
• Pathankot
• Amritsar
• Jalandhar
• Chandigarh
• Bhuj

India stated:

• Drones and missiles were intercepted by:
  • Integrated Counter-UAS Grid
  • S-400 air defence system

Indian Counter-Response

India targeted:

• Pakistani air defence systems
• Radar infrastructure around Lahore

Reports mentioned:

• Use of HARPY drones
• Neutralisation of HQ-9 air defence systems

Role of Advanced Military Technology

India

Reported use of:

• Rafale aircraft
• Air-to-surface missiles
• Surface-to-surface missiles
• Loitering munitions
• S-400 air defence system
• Counter-drone systems

International Reactions

United States

President Donald Trump:

• Called for rapid de-escalation

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio:

• Engaged with both countries diplomatically

United Nations

UN Secretary-General António Guterres:

• Urged maximum military restraint
• Warned against confrontation between nuclear powers

United Kingdom and Others

Countries including:

• UK
• Qatar
• Spain

Called for:

• Dialogue
• Restraint
• Diplomatic resolution

Ceasefire Understanding (10 May 2025)

India and Pakistan agreed to:

• Cease firing from 5 PM, 10 May 2025

However:

• Reports of continued firing and drone activity emerged after the announcement.

Major Themes Emerging from Operation Sindoor

1. New Indian Counter-Terror Doctrine

India demonstrated:

• Willingness for deep precision strikes
• Expanded operational geography
• Use of advanced stand-off weapon systems

2. Cross-Border Terrorism Remains Central

The crisis highlighted:

• Continuing India allegations regarding Pakistan-based terror infrastructure
• Persistent role of Kashmir-focused militant organisations

3. Escalation Risks Between Nuclear Powers

The episode reflected:

• High escalation potential
• Importance of deterrence stability
• Fragility of India–Pakistan crisis management mechanisms

4. Information and Narrative Warfare

Both countries:

• Issued competing claims
• Released military briefings
• Used media and diplomatic messaging extensively

Important Organisations Mentioned

Important Agreements Mentioned

Conclusion

Operation Sindoor represented a major phase in the evolution of India’s response to cross-border terrorism after the Pahalgam attack. The crisis demonstrated the increasing role of precision warfare, air defence systems, drones, and strategic signalling in India–Pakistan relations. It also highlighted the continuing volatility of the Kashmir issue and the risks associated with military escalation between two nuclear-armed neighbours.Updated – 19 May 2026 | News Sources: Reuters, BBC, Al Jazeera, The Hindu, India Today, Sky News, Swarajya